hoos jr (ProMIS Neurosciences)
90
Structured Review
ProMIS Neurosciences
hoos jr
Hoos Jr, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hoos-jr/hoos+jr/pm40484053-76-35-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Hoos Jr, supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hoos-jr/hoos+jr/pm40484053-76-35-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hoos jr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Targeted Proteomics:Article Title: A SANE Approach to Outcome Collection? Comparing the Performance of Single- Versus Multiple-Question Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Article Snippet: There was moderate to strong correlation between the M-SANE and the HOOS-Jr (r 1⁄4 0.75, P < .01) and Article Title: Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis. Article Snippet: Background: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is paramount to the creation of a valuebased healthcare system that prioritizes patient-centered care in total joint arthroplasty.. The relationship between global assessment PROs such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROs for hip and knee, such as short form variations of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) and Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOSJR), has yet to be assessed.. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess PRO measurements for knee-related and hiprelated complaints. Article Title: Concurrent validity of the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation and hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures Article Snippet: They found a strong correlation between the SANE and the HOOS-JR (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and Article Title: A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery. Article Snippet: Êi = 1.4162*B – 0.4162; where B = eA/(1 + eA); Pain3and A = 3.7265 – 0.0091*–––– – 0.1145*Function + Function2 10 4 Modification:Article Title: A SANE Approach to Outcome Collection? Comparing the Performance of Single- Versus Multiple-Question Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Article Snippet: There was moderate to strong correlation between the M-SANE and the HOOS-Jr (r 1⁄4 0.75, P < .01) and Article Title: Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis. Article Snippet: Background: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is paramount to the creation of a valuebased healthcare system that prioritizes patient-centered care in total joint arthroplasty.. The relationship between global assessment PROs such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROs for hip and knee, such as short form variations of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) and Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOSJR), has yet to be assessed.. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess PRO measurements for knee-related and hiprelated complaints. Article Title: Concurrent validity of the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation and hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures Article Snippet: They found a strong correlation between the SANE and the HOOS-JR (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and Article Title: A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery. Article Snippet: Êi = 1.4162*B – 0.4162; where B = eA/(1 + eA); Pain3and A = 3.7265 – 0.0091*–––– – 0.1145*Function + Function2 10 4 |